What changed?
Follow the move through a clear attribution timeline.
See which selection, event, or market movement contributed to the order changing.
PEAR Finance
Product visionUnderstand the market behind the result.
Explore what changed, which decision mattered, how a realistic alternative compares, and where PEAR's view differs from the crowd.
Product vision. Illustrative analysis. Not a live finance service.
Contribution, in plain language
Best decision+2.4Winner difference-1.8Field movement+0.6
- BuildYour selection set the comparison.
- MoveA market event changed the relative order.
- ExplainThe outcome becomes a clear review.
Human-language analysis
Start with the question, then reach for the model.
Finance is designed to make a result more understandable before it makes it more technical.
Which decision mattered?
Separate contribution from the final score.
Review the decision that helped, the decision that narrowed the gap, and the difference between a finish and the winner.
What does the crowd see?
Hold two perspectives beside each other.
PEAR Power Rank and the community view create a conversation, not a claim that one side is always right.
Two perspectives / Product vision
PEAR Power Rank meets the community view.
The value is disagreement, comparison, and interpretation — not a promise that PEAR predicts better.
Product vision
PEAR vs Crowd
Disagreement is the story — neither view is labelled better.
Illustrative ranking data
- NVDAPEAR #1Community #3Earnings durability is the disagreement.
- MSFTPEAR #2Community #1The crowd is more confident in the base case.
- AMZNPEAR #3Community #2Both views see a close field.
Contribution / Counterfactual
How much did this decision add compared with a realistic alternative?
A replacement comparison makes the result easier to reason about. Formal analytical terminology can come after the human question.
Your selection
AMZN+2.4 contributionRealistic alternative
MSFT+0.6 contributionWhat changed when the decision changed? A product-vision preview, not investment advice.
Attribution timeline
See what moved the competition, and when.
A retrospective view can connect the starting selection, a market event, and the final difference without pretending to be live data.
Illustrative simulated data
- 01
Build
The selected field sets the comparison.Your portfolio creates the starting question.
- 02
Move
A market event changes relative order.The timeline makes the swing legible.
- 03
Explain
Winner difference gets a reason.Review turns a finish into something you can learn from.
Product-vision capabilities
More context, revealed when it helps.
These capabilities describe the direction of the workbench. They are not live recommendations or deployed analytical services.
Event normalization
Compare decisions more fairly when companies report or experience important events at different times.
Forecasting prompts
Frame a market question, explore competing views, and learn from what happened next.
Company intelligence
Place company context, Power Rank, community perspective, and event history in one readable surface.
Play → Result → Explain
Fantasy creates the question. Finance helps examine it.
Start with a simulated competition, then return here when you want to understand the decisions and market events behind the result.
PEAR Fantasy / Simulated product
Make the market playable.
Build a portfolio, lock your picks, compete, and review the result.
Explore PEAR FantasyIllustrative result
You finished 2nd
The next question is not only where you finished, but why.
See the competition loop